spacerA growing church for growing people.

Everything That's On My Mind

 Saturday, November 22, 2008

John Ortberg is one of those authors who seems to make every topic seem very understandable. Here he discusses the gospel and hits it out of the park.

The paradign shift that Ortberg touches on has been recently studied by Leadership magazine. The results of this study mirror my own spiritual journey over the last 20 years.

Mark Roberts is in the midst of a great series of blog posts entitled Spiritual Gifts in the Body of Christ. Great stuff, as usual.

Scot McKnight's new book The Blue Parakeet is in the "next to read" position on the shelf. He recently discussed some of the high points of the book at the Catalyst conference. Skye Jethani gives us the outline.

Skye also recently blogged on the Cult of Mac. I know a few members.

Finally, Michael Spencer really got my attention with his post "Do You Really Trust Your Father With Your Life?"

Saturday, November 22, 2008 - 05:13 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [0]
 Friday, November 07, 2008
Friday, November 07, 2008 - 10:35 AM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [0]
 Sunday, December 16, 2007

Well, 6+" of snow overnight with more still coming down coupled with high winds led to canceling service this morning. That's Michigan for you. It does, however, give me a unique opportunity to post a summarized version of what I was going to preach as a blog entry. I don't generally write my sermons as some preachers do. I preach from a simple outline and rely on the inspiration of the Holy Spirit to take it from there. So that makes this an interesting exercise, at least for me.

Why do we give gifts at Christmas? Most Christians would answer "To remember the gift of Jesus that God gave us." That's not a bad answer, but I wonder if that's really true. Do we really give gifts to remember or honor the gift of Jesus, or do we do it for other reasons?

How do we honor a person or an event? For example, if I truly wanted to honor my grandfather and the time he spent with me as a child, I'd need to do something that connected to him and what he did for me. I could say, "I'm playing this round of golf in honor of my grandfather" but it really wouldn't mean anything. My grandfather never played a round of golf in his life. Now, if I were to go bowling in his honor, that would be better. My grandfather took me bowling at least once a week my entire childhood. If our Christmas gifts are to remember and honor the gift of Jesus, then our gifts should somehow reflect that. To that end, I want to highlight one important characteristic of the gift of Jesus that I think we've forgotten. As the angels announce the shepherd in Luke 2:8-14, the gift was "good news of great joy that will be for all people" (emphasis mine, of course). So why then do we primarily (or perhaps solely) give gifts to those we know and love, or perhaps more accurately, to those who already love us?

We've been taking some cues this Christmas from Charles Dickens' classic book "A Christmas Carol". One of Dickens' main themes within the book is a call to a return to charity and brotherly love, especially at Christmas. When asked for a donation for the poor, Scrooge responds that public welfare services should take care of the poor, he shouldn't be bothered. The Ghost of Christmas Present rebukes Scrooge for his cold-hearted attitude, and perhaps we should hearken to his rebuke as well. Care for our fellow man has always been part of God's call to His people. Time and again in the Old Testament, the Israelites are commanded to care for "the alien, the fatherless, and the widow." Deuteronomy 24:17 is just one example. In Jeremiah 22, God rebukes Shallum (King Jehoahaz) for not following his father's example:

"Does it make you a king to have more and more cedar? Did not your father have food and drink? He did what was right and just, so all went well with him. He defended the cause of the poor and needy, and so all went well. Is that not what it means to know me?" declares the LORD.

Jeremiah 22:15-16 (NIV)

The Apostle John brings this same thought into the New Testament canon in 1 John 3:16-18 where he boldly states that if we don't care for those in need, the love of God is not in us.

In "A Christmas Carol" the Ghost of Christmas Present shows Scrooge "the children of men", a boy and a girl named Ignorance and Want. These children still exist today. Those involved in foreign missions have always recognized this. That is why overseas missionary endeavors are so often tied to schools, hospitals, and orphanages. Missionaries understand that the gospel of Jesus is not just a message of forgiveness, but a holistic message of restoration. Scot McNight highlights this very effectively in his new book "A Community Called Atonement". Jesus' miracles of healing were not just a way to prove His identity, they were an expression of God's love for mankind and His desire to see mankind restored from all the effects of the Fall. They were an integral part of the mission of the Messiah and the meaning of the Gospel. The forgiveness and salvation we have received is not just for our benefit, but "so that we can comfort those in any trouble with the comfort we ourselves have received from God." (2 Corinthians 1:3-5)

I'm certainly not advocating an end to gift-giving at Christmas. I think it is a fine way to remember and honor the gift of Jesus. To truly honor the gift of Jesus, however, I think we need to look at how we're giving and to whom we're giving them. Jesus was given not just to the righteous but to all mankind. He was given to those who loved God and to those who were opposed to God. To truly honor the gift of Jesus, perhaps we need to broaden our gift list. Our "Giving Tree" project is certainly a step in the right direction for our church, but I think it's only the beginning. I think the folks at the Advent Conspiracy have some pretty good ideas about spending less and giving more, to cut back on what we're spending on those who love us so that we can give more to those in need. To truly honor the gift of Jesus, our giving should more closely reflect the love of the Giver and the universality of the Gift.

I'll close with another passage from "A Christmas Carol", where Dickens subtly rebukes the church for offering judgement and condemnation without offering mercy and justice:

`Spirit,' said Scrooge, after a moment's thought, `I wonder you, of all the beings in the many worlds about us, should desire to cramp these people's opportunities of innocent enjoyment.'

`I?' cried the Spirit.

`You would deprive them of their means of dining every seventh day, often the only day on which they can be said to dine at all,' said Scrooge. `Wouldn't you?'

`I?' cried the Spirit.

`You seek to close these places on the Seventh Day,' said Scrooge. `And it comes to the same thing!'

`I seek?' exclaimed the Spirit.

`Forgive me if I am wrong. It has been done in your name, or at least in that of your family,' said Scrooge.

`There are some upon this earth of yours,' returned the Spirit, `who lay claim to know us, and who do their deeds of passion, pride, ill-will, hatred, envy, bigotry, and selfishness in our name, who are as strange to us and all our kith and kin, as if they had never lived. Remember that, and charge their doings on themselves, not us.'

...or better yet, with Jesus' own words:

"Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.'

"They also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?'

"He will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.'"

Matthew 25:41-45 (NIV)

P.S. Don't miss Keith Schooley's excellent blog post on Christmas gifts.

Sunday, December 16, 2007 - 03:25 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [1]
 Tuesday, November 20, 2007

There’s an email being forwarded around this Christmas season regarding sending Christmas cards to the ACLU. If you haven’t received it, a copy of the email is below.

With all due respect, this is absolutely the WRONG thing to do at Christmas. Even if you disagree with the ACLU, maliciously trying to “freeze their operations” is absolutely ANTI-Christian; a violation of Christ’s teachings and the Christmas spirit. What happened to “love your enemies”? (Matthew 5:44) What happened to “If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink.” (Romans 12:20) Not to mention the idea of dishonestly writing “contribution enclosed” on the envelope. Don’t tell me “but I contributed a bible verse!”…please. We all know it’s intentionally dishonest and SINFUL. Have we completely forgotten how Christ calls us to behave? This is exactly the kind of thing that gives Christians the reputation of being malicious, hateful, and petty. How can we proclaim “God is love” and act in such hateful ways?

While the ACLU is involved in trying to get nativities off government property*, they have NOTHING to do with stores changing from “Merry Christmas” to “Happy Holidays”. Stores are doing that as a business decision because fewer and fewer of their customers are actually Christians. The solution to that is NOT to protest, but for Christians to MAKE MORE CHRISTIANS!!!

Please, please, please, I beg you, DO NOT do this and DO NOT forward it on to other people. The only thing it will accomplish is to make things more difficult for people who are actually trying to share the Gospel.

Sorry for the rant, but these things really get under my skin.

* Personally, I don’t think getting nativities off government property is such a bad thing. I don’t want my Savior associated with corrupt politicians. Why do we want people who aren’t living according to Christ’s words promoting Him, anyway?

 

Here's the email in question:


This is coming early (really early) so that you can get ready to include an important address to your list. Read on ...

Fun with the ACLU ... Wanna have some fun this CHRISTMAS? Send the ACLU a CHRISTMAS CARD this year.

As they are working so very hard to get rid of the CHRISTMAS part of this holiday, we should all send them a nice, CHRISTIAN card to brighten up their dark, sad, little world.

Make sure it says "Merry Christmas" on it!

Here's the address, just don't be rude or crude. (It's Not the Christian Way, you know!)

ACLU
125 Broad Street
18th Floor
New York, NY 10004

Two tons of Christmas cards would freeze their operations because they wouldn't know if any were regular mail containing contributions. (Put "contribution enclosed" on the envelope and inside contribute a bible verse!!) So spend 39 cents and tell the ACLU to leave Christmas alone. Also tell them that there is no such thing as a "Holiday Tree" ... It's a Christmas Tree even in the fields!!

REMEMBER send a card that says MERRY CHRISTMAS not HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!!

And pass this on to your email lists. We really want to communicate with the ACLU! They really DESERVE us!!

Tuesday, November 20, 2007 - 09:52 AM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [0]
 Saturday, June 16, 2007

Ben Witherington seems to be on a pilgrimage of sorts this summer. His recent post about the city of Ephesus is excellent. It must be nice to have summers off.

Scot McKnight's series "Letters to Emerging Christians" has been full of interesting nuggets. The most recent letter addresses how to explain the Gospel simply and accurately.I like his Kingdom focus. Rick Meigs (the Blind Beggar) posted on a similar topic recently.

Earl Creps recently wrote a very convicting piece entitled Landfill Repentance.

Mark Roberts recently had the opportunity to debate Christopher Hitchens, author of the recent book god is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything on Hugh Hewitt's podcast. He's been elaborating in a series on his blog.

Finally, Angie sent me this link. I don't know whether to laugh or cry. Probably both. Yikes!

Saturday, June 16, 2007 - 09:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time    #       Comments [0]
 Wednesday, June 06, 2007

David Wayne's post this morning really struck me, I think I know how he feels.

Yes, I haven't been writing much on the blog recently. I have at least a half dozen half-written entries in Windows Live Writer at the moment, most of which are now too dated to be worth finishing. I do have a series in the works, hopefully I'll get it started soon.

Wednesday, June 06, 2007 - 04:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time    #       Comments [0]
 Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Mark Lauterbach over at the Gospel Driven Life blog offers a variation on the theme of my easter sermon. Enjoy!

P.S. I know I haven't been posting much lately. No excuses, but I do hope to be a little more active soon.

Tuesday, April 10, 2007 - 09:53 AM Eastern Daylight Time    #       Comments [0]
 Wednesday, March 28, 2007

I found this interesting article today. I don't highlight this article for political reasons. To be honest, I'm not a big fan of either politician at this point. What I find interesting is the ease with which human beings are able to claim they believe something without actually acting to do anything about it. It's not just politicians, it's all of us. We're all prone to hypocrisy. It's very easy for us to point out that trait in others, but how easily do we recognize it in ourselves? Jesus' instructions ring loud and clear: we need to worry more about the plank than the sawdust.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007 - 12:19 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [0]
 Tuesday, February 27, 2007

The folks over at Christianity Today Movies have been taking some heat lately for publishing less-than-glowing reviews of recent films made by Christians while positively reviewing "questionable" R-rated movies. CT has published a commentary on the topic. It's actually an edited version of a blog entry by Jeffery Overstreet, one of the CT Movies reviewers. I highly recommend reading it, and then re-reading it.

This issue and these responses got me thinking about a related issue. There seems to be a feeling among some Christians that we should all be "nice" to each other, that we should never criticize each other, especially if we're doing the "right thing". In other words, if the message is the right message, you shouldn't criticize how the message is being communicated. I think this attitude is wrong-headed.

The underlying assumption here is that being nice = being loving. It's not true. In fact, sometimes being nice is most assuredly NOT the loving thing to do. We are called to spur one another on in the most literal sense of the word. The NIV and NET translations chose the word "spur" because the original Greek word literally means "a sharpening". Sometimes, being "spurred" is painful, just ask any horse.

We must speak the truth in love, but we still must speak the truth. Our primary goal as Christians should not be to avoid conflict but to provoke continual growth and maturity, not just in areas of life traditionally considered "spiritual" but in all areas of life. We need to encourage and cheer for each other when we use our gifts, but to deny each other the "spur" of constructive criticism is to act un-lovingly.

I appreciate Jeffery Overstreet, Peter Chattaway, and their collegues over at CT Movies. I value their reviews and the way they address both the message and the artistic qualities of movies in an honest way. Keep up the good work, folks. Spur Christian artists on to excellence. It's the loving thing to do.

Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 07:29 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [0]
 Tuesday, January 23, 2007

When I was in my 20s, there was a weekly Sunday night pilgrimage to a place called Carlos Murphy's after church. (There's a flashback for long time Detroit suburbanites. It's now the Southfield Fishbones.) Each week there would be 8-15 semi-rowdy 20-somethings sharing a too-small table and laughing loudly. All the wait staff there knew us and knew where we came from. They were always friendly and accommodating even though I'm sure we were not the easiest group to accommodate. Yet every week when the hat was passed to cover the bill, we were always woefully short in the tip department. This always got under my skin and I worried about the impression we Christians were leaving with the wait staff. I usually ended up kicking in extra to make up the difference.

I'm reminded of this by Trevin Wax's "5 Tips for Good Tipping" over at Kingdom People. IMHO Christians be notable for their generosity (Proverbs 11:25) and that includes tipping. Not just to be a witness for Christ, but as a spiritual discipline. Unless you're dining at The Capital Grille, you're only saving a buck or two by tipping light. Personally, I start off at about 18%. I only go down to 15% if the service is really bad, and I can't remember the last time I tipped less than 15%.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007 - 02:16 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [0]
 Friday, January 05, 2007

Skye Jethani has written a very thought-provoking article on the Out of Ur blog. Here's a quote:

"Seeking survival and fearing irrelevance, have we clothed our faith with the forms of our American culture to the point that our Christianity has morphed into something entirely different—a folk religion altogether consumerist in spirit and content?"

This is an interesting question, but I think it's the wrong question. Is there a folk religion in the U.S. masquerading as Christianity? Without a doubt. When 80+% of the population self-identifies as Christian, there's clearly some poor definitions of Christianity being used. The real critical question is, what is the cause? I don't think survival and relevance are the issues.

I suppose you could say it's semantics but as I define it, relevance is not evil even though some treat it as such. It can be overemphasized but that's a symptom, not the disease. Relevance in proper balance is simply communicating and applying the Gospel to an existing culture. This is what Paul did on Mars Hill, it's not a new phenomenon indicating the arrival of Laodicea.

The real problem is not a desire for relevance but a desire for comfort. We want to be comfortable in our world, and we want our world to be comfortable with us. We want to live just like our neighbors so they won't feel uncomfortable around us and we'll feel accepted. Too often faith is compromised for the sake of fitting in. Peer pressure is not just a problem for teenagers, it's just as bad or worse for adults. We must realize that this world will never be comfortable with the message of Christ, and we cannot be (or shouldn't be) comfortable in this world. I don't think we need to beware relevance OR irrelevance. We need to beware becoming comfortable. If we become comfortable, we cease to be salt and light.

I'm not saying we need to go back to the days of Holiness legalism just so we can make people uncomfortable. That's not the kind of discomfort I'm talking about. We're not called to find creative ways to make people uncomfortable around us. We're called to be Christ-like by loving, sacrificing, healing, caring, giving, praying, and worshipping. If we can even come close to accomplishing that, it will create plenty of appropriate discomfort.

Friday, January 05, 2007 - 05:25 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [0]
 Sunday, December 10, 2006

There's an interesting scene in The Nativity Story where Mary asks Joseph, "Do you ever wonder when we'll know that he's more than just a child? Will it be something he says, a look in his eye?" In response, Joseph wonders if he'll even be able to teach Jesus anything. This reminded me of a question that has interested me for many years. When did Jesus become "self-aware"? When did He realize that He was the Son of God, the Messiah, the sacrificial Lamb? And how did that realization come about?

The scriptures are nearly silent about Jesus' childhood and early adulthood. Beyond the nativity story, we have only the story of Jesus' visit to the Temple when he was twelve years old in Luke 2. We have no direct witness to reference on this question. Perhaps that is why I've never seen it addressed in any books I've read. Nevertheless, I find the question interesting and I think it's possible to make a few safe assumptions based on what we know and perhaps develop a reasonable theory. What follows is my theory, for what it's worth.

First of all, I think it's obvious that Jesus didn't emerge from the womb fully self-aware. There's no indication He was gathering disciples and teaching in parables as a child. There are apocryphal stories of Jesus performing miracles as a child, but nothing in the canon. The story of Jesus at the Temple indicates that Jesus was an amazing child and exceptional in His understanding of scripture, but it also indicates that He was asking questions and listening to the teachers; learning as any normal child would. He does, at this point, recognize who His Father is, but that is no surprise. Joseph and Mary certainly would have told Him about His miraculous birth and the messages the angels gave them. Did He realize at this point the magnitude of His mission? Did He know that he would suffer and die? I don't think so. Luke 2:52 states "Jesus grew in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and men." His understanding developed gradually just like any other child.

I believe Jesus' wasn't aware of the full magnitude of His mission until He began His earthly ministry. In fact, I think it's possible if not likely that he received that revelation during His time of prayer and fasting in the wilderness (Matthew 4:1-11). I also believe that His understanding of His mission on earth developed primarily through His study of the scriptures and through prayer. Why? Because I believe in the most basic of Christian doctrines, Jesus' full divinity and full humanity. If Jesus was fully human while here on earth, then He received His commission from God the same way we do. Once He understood His calling, He had to choose to follow it just as we do. If He was "tempted in every way, just as we are" (Hebrews 4:15), then He was required to live by faith just as we are. Doubting His understanding of God's plan and His place in it must have been a possibility for Jesus, and clearly was. Satan's first two temptations of Jesus in the wilderness were prefaced with the phrase "If you are the Son of God...". Satan was clearly trying to chip away at Jesus' faith in who He was and whether or not the Father was with Him. If Jesus' had actually just received the knowledge of His impending sacrificial death, then Satan's temptations were all the more sadistic. Either way, I believe Jesus was just like us. He received His instructions from God via scripture and prayer and was required to follow by faith, which He did.

You may ask, what is the point of this theological flight of fancy? Simply this. I think we often minimize the reality of Jesus' humanity. We think that because He is the Son of God, He had special access to God that we don't have. We think (though we may not say it out loud) that because He is the Son of God, we can't truly be Christ-like, therefore we don't really try to attain it. We choose some lesser measure of godliness to be our standard of achievement. This attitude keeps us from being all that God has intended us to be. Jesus said we would do everything He did and more (John 14:12), but we don't really believe it...or at least we don't act like it. We settle for so much less. A true understanding of Jesus' humanity will lead us to a deeper understanding of the power that is available to us through the Holy Spirit and the responsibility that is ours to truly become Christ-like.

Sunday, December 10, 2006 - 03:15 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [4]

On this page...

Search
<January 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567
Blogroll
Links

Categories


The ONE Campaign!


Sign In