spacerA growing church for growing people.

Everything That's On My Mind

 Tuesday, March 07, 2006
Chuck Colson introduced me to this term in his BreakPoint commentary this morning. I like it. I've never owned Birkenstocks (though my aunt lives in them), I don't like granola much, and I don't own a gun, but I do like this idea of rejecting the “consumerist and individualistic mainstream of American life.” American Christianity has been far too influenced by the materialistic, individualistic culture of our country, to the point that is has impacted theological and ethical thinking. Anyone who's attended our church for a while has heard me mention this more than once. I'm still more materialistic and individualistic than I should be, but we're all products of our culture and constantly "unlearning" things we have been taught in favor of a higher Truth. Too often we forget that our culture is controlled by an Enemy that is trying to distract us from the Truth. The tools of that distraction are not just the obvious vices, but also seemingly good things like the "American dream."

Crunchy food for thought.

Tuesday, March 07, 2006 - 03:15 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [0]
 Sunday, March 05, 2006

It’s with some trepidation that I begin this blog entry. As Brian McLaren has outlined recently, trying to address the issue of homosexuality is a minefield for those of us trying to accurately represent both the truth of God’s word and the truth of His love for sinners. With this year’s movies like “Brokeback Mountain”, “Transamerica”, and to a lesser degree, “Capote”,* Hollywood has brought this issue to the forefront like never before. Many in the Christian community have decried the purported agenda of these movies. On the eve of the Academy Awards, I offer a few observations on the issue of homosexual behavior.

  • Homosexual behavior is sin. There is no honest, literal reading of scripture that can come to any other conclusion. However, it is not a “special” sin. It is no different to God than the sins we find “more acceptable” like divorce, lust, or greed. As fallen human beings, we classify sins. Those who are overcome by sins that we ourselves are tempted by receive our understanding and mercy, whereas those who are overcome by sins that we are not tempted by are more likely to be condemned and ostracized. God has no such categories. Spending time browsing the latest Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition is no less repugnant in God’s eyes than homosexual activity.
  • We need to learn how to listen, even to viewpoints that we disagree with. Listening, discussing, and caring will not “compromise” the Gospel. Quite to the contrary, how can we expect anyone to listen to our viewpoint if we are unwilling to listen to their viewpoint? Spreading the Gospel does not require silencing the voices of dissent; the Holy Spirit is powerful enough to overcome all opposition. Have we learned nothing from church history?
  • Can we as Christians please refrain from joining the fraternity of the perpetually offended? Do we really want to be associated with PETA, NOW, Greenpeace and the rest of the professional protest industry? When I read scripture, I don’t see Jesus or John or Paul or James or Peter decrying the decay of Roman society or calling for political change. Picket lines and press releases do not help spread the Gospel. The fires of revival are not fed by political action; they are fed by prayer, devotion, and holiness.
Yes, we live in a society that is in decline. Yes, voices we disagree with are getting louder and louder. Yes, behaviors that God calls sin are becoming more and more acceptable in our culture. The answer is not political power; the answer is Holy Spirit power. Our calling is not to protest, but to make disciples. Our message is not one of condemnation, but one of love.

With the tongue we praise our Lord and Father, and with it we curse men, who have been made in God's likeness. Out of the same mouth come praise and cursing. My brothers, this should not be.
James 3:9-10 (NIV)

* Full disclosure: I have not seen any of the three movies mentioned above. The only one I have any plans to see is “Capote”. In fact, as I look at the list of Oscar nominees I realize I have seen very few of the nominated movies this year and none of the Best Picture nominees, which is surprising to me.

Sunday, March 05, 2006 - 03:14 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [0]
 Monday, February 27, 2006
Thanks to Matthew Self (The Gad(d)about) for the link to this powerful article.

Monday, February 27, 2006 - 03:13 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [0]
 Tuesday, February 21, 2006
There's another good post today by Joe Carter over at the Evangelical Outpost. I'm not always a big fan of Dr. Dobson's tactics or positions (I've sent a scathing email or two to Focus on the Family) but in this case I find myself in agreement with him. It appears his critics on the reciprocal beneficiary contracts issue haven't thought clearly about the issue. Joe makes a great comparison to Ruth and Naomi. It's not about sex it's about love, and as Christians we should understand the difference.

Tuesday, February 21, 2006 - 03:11 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [1]
 Monday, February 20, 2006
Sometimes, only the words of Charlie Brown will do.

Argh!!!

I love metro Detroit. I've lived in the city itself and I've lived in the suburbs. I think Detroit is a great place, despite all the decay and neglect in the city itself. I love to go downtown for events like the Jazz Festival, Winter Blast, the Auto Show, and of course the occasional ballgame. My wife and I went to Cleveland recently and I was blown away by the positive changes in that city. I still believe that kind of revival can happen in Detroit.

That's why it is  SO frustrating to see all the bickering and self-serving posturing by the political leaders of our region. The latest sad example is the Detroit Zoo fiasco. How incredibly stupid to use this wonderful institution as a political poker chip. Now, I'm not trying to assign blame on anyone. I don't need to, there's plenty to go around. Shame on everyone involved.

One step forward, two steps back...argh!!!

Monday, February 20, 2006 - 03:09 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [2]
 Thursday, February 16, 2006

This may be my first little “dry spell” as a blogger. I just haven’t been inspired to write anything for a few days. Of course, that word “inspired” carries a bit of baggage for conservative evangelical Christians, so maybe I should find another term. Let’s just say my muse has been silent. Oh wait, that’s pagan Greek mythology…aarrgh.

My last entry about the ECI got me thinking about global issues that I put on the back burner a few years ago. Conservative evangelical Christianity has tended to shy away from social justice and economic issues, not wanting to be accused of promoting a “liberal social gospel”. In some ways, it’s like how a friend of mine describes his Baptist upbringing...no one wanted to talk about the Holy Spirit for fear of being accused of being a closet Pentecostal. (Oh, the horror!!!) I must admit, I’ve probably been caught in the same “throwing the baby out with the bathwater” trap, whether it’s because I’m a conservative evangelical Christian, or simply because I’m a dumb American who hasn’t really experienced much of the rest of the world.

As some of you may have noticed, I’ve begun to revisit social issues lately. There has been a lot of “buzz” on these kinds of issues lately, whether it is Rick Warren’s work in Rwanda, Bono’s work with DATA, or the SAY Detroit campaign surrounding the Super Bowl. My friend Keith and I have been trading emails on such subjects lately, too.

(Quick aside: It’s been interesting reading Mark Robert’s comments on Bono’s sermon at the National Prayer Breakfast, since he was actually present at the breakfast. Check it out.)

It seems to me the primary issues in most world conflicts revolve around economics, when you get right down to it. Poverty is a desperate state, and desperate people do desperate things. If we want less conflict in the world, we need to focus more on the issue of poverty in addition to (not instead of) the Gospel of Christ. The question is, what can I do about worldwide poverty? Well, the first thing I can do is make sure I support those closest to me. For example, I’ve already blogged about the SAY Detroit campaign. The reality is, however, that the poorest in the USA are rich in comparison to much of the world. What can I do for the rest of the world?

There are many “easy” answers like sponsoring a World Vision child, but what about the old saw about teaching a man to fish? Wouldn’t it be better to be involved in helping people make a good living for themselves? A few years back the “Fair Trade” movement caught my attention, but I didn’t do anything about it at the time. I’m thinking about it again. The basic idea is, give a little more thought to the source of the items we buy and maybe intentionally spend a little more on an item that has been made by someone working realistic hours at a fair wage. We’ve heard the stories of sweat-shops and child labor problems in other countries, yet we still go to Wal-Mart to get the cheap clothing.

It’s hard for me, having been raised to be frugal, to intentionally spend more than I need to but perhaps I need to think less selfishly about such things. Perhaps good stewardship of God’s blessings means more than just getting the best deal when I go to the store. Can I make some different spending decisions and make a small contribution to the economic well being of others? Bono and his wife have started a new clothing company called Edun with these principles in mind, although they seem to be targeting consumers with much more disposable income than I have. I’m not about to go out and spend $100+ on a pair of jeans, but I’m at least going to try to start thinking about how my spending decisions affect others.

Thursday, February 16, 2006 - 03:08 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [0]
 Wednesday, February 08, 2006
I'm not a climatologist. I don't even play one on TV. In fact, I've never been very interested in environmental science at all. I am, however, very interested in the new Evangelical Climate Initiative. Not because I agree or disagree with it, but because it (hopefully) is the beginning of real political change within the evangelical community.

I have always been fairly conservative politically. I went through my Limbaugh phase. I've moderated a lot since then, but I still generally tend to tip to the conservative side of politics. That being said, I'm not a big fan of the way the evangelical community has hitched its wagon so tightly to the Republican party. I don't think it's healthy for either side. I certainly don't agree with the idea that a "good Christian" has to be a Republican...or a Democrat for that matter. The ECI is the first time I've noticed high-profile evangelical leaders break from the Republican party line. Even if they're wrong, I'm glad they had the courage to challenge the status quo. I think it's best for Christians to take stands on specific issues, rather than blindly support one political party.

So you may be wondering...what do I think about global warming? My answer is, I don't know. I'm too ignorant on the issue to allow anyone to care about what I think about it. Mankind is the caretaker of this world God created, however, so I think Christians should be more engaged in environmental issues than they are. There's no reason we shouldn't take better care of this planet, whether we're warming it or not.

Wednesday, February 08, 2006 - 03:07 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [0]
 Monday, February 06, 2006

OK, I admit it. I'm a techno-geek. I own one of the original PalmPilot PDAs. I still have it in a drawer somewhere…cracked screen and all. Technology is all over my life. Every now and then, however, I'm uncharacteristically slow in adopting a new technology. I've been hearing the term RSS for years, but never really took the time to understand the technology. Now that I do, I wonder why it took me so long. RSS (and ATOM) feeds are great time-management tools if you know how to use them.

I'm a voracious reader, particularly when it comes to news items and magazine articles on topics that interest me. Long ago, I learned about the benefits of pre-reading and skimming. Pre-reading is a technique for quickly determining the topic and general content of an article to determine if it is worth spending time reading it in depth. Some people call this skimming but in my opinion skimming is a different skill, somewhere between pre-reading and normal reading. Both pre-reading and skimming are important time-management techniques. If you read as much as I do, you need learn them.

With the advent of the Internet, we have access (and most of it free) to more information sources than anyone could have imagined just a couple decades ago. For someone like me, this can create a time-management nightmare. There are easily 50+ web sites that I visit on a regular basis, from The Detroit News to Christianity Today to Rotten Tomatoes, not to mention all the other bloggers I read. That’s where RSS comes in. Most online publications (including bloggers like me) now offer an RSS feed, which provides the title and the first few paragraphs of the content. With a good RSS reader/aggregator, you can be notified when a new article is posted and quickly determine if it’s worth reading or not. This can save you lots of surfing time.

So I’m a little embarrassed to admit that I’m just now getting up to speed on this technology, but better late than never, right? If you’re an information-aholic like me, you need to check out this technology. I haven’t actually calculated how much time I’m saving, but I’m confident it’s significant. Here are a few of the RSS aggregators I’ve tried, with some comments. Since I’m a cheapskate, these are all free.

  • My Yahoo lets you add RSS feeds to your home page but you only get article titles, so I didn’t find it all that helpful.
  • The Firefox browser has some RSS support (called Live Bookmarks) built-in, but it’s not very feature-rich. Habari Xenu is a plug-in for Firefox that is much superior to the built-in support.
  •  There are stand-alone Windows applications like Feed Explorer and Sharp Reader. They’re nice, but I prefer something that’s integrated into software I already use regularly.
  • Right now, I’m using intraVnews (thanks for the tip, Bob), which is a plug-in for Microsoft Outlook. Since Outlook is always running on my PC, this has been the most convenient aggregator I’ve tried. Until I find something better, I think I’m sticking with this one.
If you’re a patient soul, Internet Explorer 7 and Outlook 12 are supposed to have built-in RSS support, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. Besides, why wait? You could be saving valuable time right now.

P.S. In case you haven’t noticed, the link for my RSS feed is on the right, below the calendar.

Monday, February 06, 2006 - 03:04 PM Eastern Standard Time    #       Comments [2]

On this page...

Search
<March 2006>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2627281234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678
Blogroll
Links

Categories


The ONE Campaign!


Sign In